Ocular Surface Disease as Extraesophageal Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Manifestation: A Specific Therapeutic Strategy

imagePurpose:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are common gastrointestinal disorders with extraesophageal manifestations (EGERD). Studies showed a correlation between GERD/LPR and ocular discomfort. Our aim was to report the prevalence of ocular involvement in patients with GERD/LPR, describe clinical and biomolecular manifestations, and provide a treatment strategy for this novel EGERD comorbidity.

Methods:

Fifty-three patients with LPR and 25 healthy controls were enrolled in this masked randomized controlled study. Fifteen naive patients with LPR were treated with magnesium alginate eye drops and oral therapy (magnesium alginate and simethicone tablets) with a 1-month follow-up. Clinical ocular surface evaluation, Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, tear sampling, and conjunctival imprints were performed. Tear pepsin levels were quantified by ELISA. Imprints were processed for human leukocyte antigen-DR isotype (HLA-DR) immunodetection and for HLA-DR, IL8, mucin 5AC (MUC5AC), nicotine adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) transcript expression (PCR).

Results:

Patients with LPR had significantly increased Ocular Surface Disease Index (P

Publication Rates of Registered Corneal Trials on ClinicalTrials.gov

imagePurpose:

This study aimed to characterize cornea-centered clinical trials, completed before 2020, registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and identify discrepancies in publication.

Methods:

ClinicalTrials.gov, a database from the National Institutes of Health, was queried to identify registered cornea-related clinical trials. Trials were included if they were interventional and completed before January 1, 2020. ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed.gov, and Google Scholar were then searched to evaluate publications from the trial. Data collected for each trial included sponsor, intervention type, phase, dry eye focus, and location of the principal investigator.

Results:

A total of 520 trials were included in the final analysis. Of all studies, 270 (51.9%) were found to have published results. Industry-sponsored studies were associated with drug intervention trials, dry eye focus, and the principal investigator’s location within the United States (P

Ocular Surface Disease in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Treated With Dupilumab: A Prospective Case–Control Study

imagePurpose:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation of dry eye disease (DED) prevalence in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with dupilumab.

Methods:

This prospective case–control study included consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe AD scheduled for dupilumab between May and December 2021 and healthy subjects. DED prevalence, the Ocular Surface Disease Index, tear film breakup time test, osmolarity, Oxford staining score, and Schirmer test results were collected at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after dupilumab therapy. The Eczema Area and Severity Index was assessed at baseline. Ocular side effects and discontinuation of dupilumab were also recorded.

Results:

Seventy-two eyes from 36 patients with AD treated with dupilumab and 36 healthy controls were included. Prevalence of DED increased from 16.7% at baseline to 33.3% at 6 months in the dupilumab group (P = 0.001), whereas it remained unchanged in the control group (P = 0.110). At 6 months, the Ocular Surface Disease Index and Oxford score increased (from 8.5 ± 9.8 to 11.0 ± 13.0, P = 0.068, and from 0.1 ± 0.5 to 0.3 ± 0.6, P = 0.050, respectively), the tear film breakup time test and Schirmer test results decreased (from 7.8 ± 2.6 s to 7.1 ± 2.7 s, P 0.05). Osmolarity was unchanged (dupilumab P = 0.987 and controls P = 0.073). At 6 months after dupilumab therapy, 42% of patients had conjunctivitis, 36% blepharitis, and 2.8% keratitis. No severe side effects were reported, and none of the patients discontinued dupilumab. No association between Eczema Area and Severity Index and DED prevalence was shown.

Conclusions:

DED prevalence increased in patients with AD treated with dupilumab at 6 months. However, no severe ocular side effects were found and no patient discontinued therapy.

Evaluation of Limbal Stem Cells in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: An In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study

imagePurpose:

This study aimed to investigate corneal limbus changes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and explore the correlation between their ocular manifestations and systemic status.

Methods:

Fifty-five patients with type 2 DM and 20 age-matched controls were included. The following IVCM parameters were compared between the 2 groups: palisades of Vogt (POV), corneal epithelial thickness (CET), basal cell density (BCD), subbasal nerve plexus, and dendritic cell density. All subjects underwent blood and urine sampling for laboratory analysis, including fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, C-reactive protein, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, urine albumin, and urine creatinine. The correlations between IVCM parameters and blood biomarkers were detected. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used for selecting the cutoff value of risk factors for corneal stem cell injury in patients with DM.

Results:

Compared with controls, patients with DM displayed a significant reduction of POV (superior region, P = 0.033; inferior region, P = 0.003; nasal region, P