Department of Biochemistry

Background/Objectives: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain cancer with limited treatment options. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from GBM cells contain important biomarkers, such as microRNAs, proteins, and DNA mutations, which are involved in tumor progression, invasion, and resistance to treatment. Identifying surface markers on these EVs is crucial for their isolation and potential use in noninvasive diagnosis. This study aimed to use tumor-derived explants to investigate the surface markers of EVs and explore their role as diagnostic biomarkers for GBM. Methods: Tumor explants from nine GBM patients without IDH1/IDH2 mutations or 1p-19q co-deletion were cultured to preserve both tumor viability and cytoarchitecture. EVs were collected from the tumor microenvironment using differential centrifugation, filtration, and membrane affinity binding. Their surface protein composition was analyzed through multiplex protein assays. RNA-Seq data from TCGA and GTEx datasets, along with in silico single-cell RNA-seq data, were used to assess EV surface biomarker expression across large GBM patient cohorts. Results: The in vitro model successfully replicated the tumor microenvironment and produced EVs with distinct surface markers. Biomarker analysis in large datasets revealed specific expression patterns unique to GBM patients compared with healthy controls. These markers demonstrated potential as a GBM-specific signature and were correlated with clinical data. Furthermore, in silico single-cell RNA-seq provided detailed insights into biomarker distribution across different cell types within the tumor. Conclusions: This study underscores the efficacy of the tumor-derived explant model and its potential to advance the understanding of GBM biology and EV production. A key innovation is the isolation of EVs from a model that faithfully mimics the tumor’s original cytoarchitecture, offering a deeper understanding of the cells involved in EV release. The identified EV surface markers represent promising targets for enhancing EV isolation and optimizing their use as diagnostic tools. Moreover, further investigation into their molecular cargo may provide crucial insights into tumor characteristics and evolution.

Background: Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a low-grade tumor of the sinonasal tract with frequent extension to the orbit and skull base. Due to its rare incidence and recent histopathological and molecular characterization, little data are available in regard to its natural history, treatment and surveillance protocol. Methods: A comprehensive literature review in Embase online electronic databases on BSNS was made. The analyzed factors included the patients’ sex and age, presenting symptoms and signs, anatomical origin and pattern of growth of the tumor, immunohistochemical and molecular features, time to treatment, type of treatment, surgical approach, extent of resection, peri- and post-operative complications, adjuvant therapies, clinical outcome, recurrence and overall survival rates. Results: This literature review involved 34 studies for an overall series of 149 cases of BSNS. The female (66.9%) and middle-aged populations (median 54.88 years old) were mainly affected. The most frequent clinical onset was nasal obstruction (81%), followed by facial discomfort (44%), epistaxis (15.5%) and ocular impairment (14.3%). Ethmoid sinus (67.8%) and nasal cavity (45.4%) were the most common anatomical site of tumor origin, while an extension to the orbit and skull base was registered in 28.7% and 24.5% of cases. Surgery was the main treatment, especially in the form of endoscopic endonasal approach (56.9%), and allowed for gross total resection in 79% of cases. The recurrence rate was 26.2%; three cases of tumor-related death were reported. Median follow-up was 4.6 years. Conclusions: Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma is a rare and unique tumoral entity in terms of biological and clinical behavior. Based on the current knowledge, surgery plays the leading role in treatment, accounting for gross total tumor resection in most cases, allowing for clinical symptom and sign resolution and presenting a low rate of perioperative complications. The type of approach and the aim of surgery should be assessed case by case according to patient and pathology features and the surgeon’s experience, as well as the aim of the treatment. Further studies including large surgical series and with long follow-up are required to define prognostic factors and guidelines of treatment for this peculiar pathological entity.